I've been using ReSharper for a while now and sometimes it suggests that I invert the if . I guess an example would be a better explanation of my situation:
Ccna final exam - java, php, javascript, ios, cshap all in one. This is a collaboratively edited question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers. It's 100% free, no registration required.
Showing posts with label resharper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label resharper. Show all posts
Monday, June 11, 2012
Does inverting the "if' improve performance?
Sunday, June 10, 2012
Access to Modified Closure
string [] files = new string[2];
files[0] = "ThinkFarAhead.Example.Settings.Configuration_Local.xml";
files[1] = "ThinkFarAhead.Example.Settings.Configuration_Global.xml";
//Resharper complains this is an "access to modified closure"
for (int i = 0; i < files.Length; i++ )
{
// Resharper disable AccessToModifiedClosure
if(Array.Exists(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetManifestResourceNames(),
delegate(string name) { return name.Equals(files[i]); }))
return Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetManifestResourceStream(files[i]);
// ReSharper restore AccessToModifiedClosure
}
Tags
c#,
closures,
resharper,
Tips For Programmer
Friday, May 18, 2012
Virtual member call in a constructor
I'm getting a warning from ReSharper about a call to a virtual member from my objects constructor. Why would this be something not to do?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)