I love the new live event in jQuery 1.3. The question I have is the performance of this event. I know the advantages of using live over click/bind('click') but is there a performance hit for using it over click/bind('click')?
If not, why would you ever use click or bind('click')?
Source: Tips4all
If not, why would you ever use click
ReplyDeleteor bind('click')?
Because $.live() has some significant disadvantages
Live events do not bubble in the traditional manner and cannot be
stopped using stopPropagation or
stopImmediatePropagation. For example,
take the case of two click events -
one bound to "li" and another "li a".
Should a click occur on the inner
anchor BOTH events will be triggered.
This is because when a
$("li").bind("click", fn); is bound
you're actually saying "Whenever a
click event occurs on an LI element -
or inside an LI element - trigger this
click event." To stop further
processing for a live event, fn must
return false.
Live events currently only work when used against a selector. For
example, this would work: $("li
a").live(...) but this would not:
$("a", someElement).live(...) and
neither would this:
$("a").parent().live(...).
See this.
ReplyDeleteAs for why you would ever use click or bind instead of live, the answer is because you don't need the extra functionality.
You should read this very good answer in this similar thread:
ReplyDeleteIs binding events in jQuery very expensive, or very inexpensive?